Cognizance of the subject after the occurrence of the adverse drug reaction
-
摘要: 发生药品不良反应后,究竟应由谁来对患者受到的损害承担责任?长期以来一直存在争议。司法实践中,法院往往依据民法中的公平原则判决医院承担相应责任。笔者拟通过对一起案例进行剖析,指出药品不良反应案例的审理仍应根据“过错原则”来认定,并提出在无过错主体情形下如何维护受害人合法权益的法律建议。Abstract: In the adverse drug reactions, who should be the one to be responsible for patient suffers, which had been controversial for long time. In the judicial practice, law court often judged hospital to take the responsibility based on the fairness doctrine in civil law. A case was analyzed to point out that the trial of cases of the adverse drug reaction should still be identified according to fault principle. The legal advice to safeguard the legitimate rights in the condition of no-mistake subject was puts forward.
-
[1] 管媛媛,梁 毅,葛卫红. 我国药品不良反应相关文献分析[J].中国药物警戒,2006,3(5):277. [2] 于培明.黄泰康.药品不良反应法律责任设置的理论分析[J]. 中国药事,2007,21(7):468. [3] 伍鑫华.试论药品不良反应及其法律责任[J]. 淮海医药,2010,28(3):260. [4] 祝眉娜,李 野,杨莉.论我国药品不良反应的法律责任[J].食品药品监管,2008,17(6):6. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2820
- HTML全文浏览量: 215
- PDF下载量: 103
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
